However, after doing a lot of experimentation and trying different combinations of adjustments, I need to revise that. And in the past I've written that I don't think PN works so well on m4/3 files. The Fuji X files are an obvious case where a programme like PN produces much sharper results with none of the softening effects that Adobe create, but my Leica X-Vario files are significantly sharper when processed via PN, showing that even Leica like to dictate what we get.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER VS LIGHTROOM FUJI SOFTWARE
party software programmes for raw conversion 'let more of the original image through' (I can't think of a better way to describe it) allowing the user to decide how much 'correcting' and noise reducing to do.īut there are alternatives and yes they do sometimes have to be worked at, but in many instances the results are worth it. The most notorious example of which is what Adobe do to Fuji X files.
This 'noise paranoia' results in a softening of the files. Most of this occurs with input from the manufacturers and usually involves a degree of noise reduction even before you get to the camera raw interface. What I like is how PN 'bypasses' the background processing that happens to raw files in Adobe software. In all cases I prefer these conversions to what I get in Photoshop and with a little work to find what gives the best results for each camera I can get some really impressive files. I processed the files in the last couple of days using Photo Ninja as my raw converter. The above images were shot during the last 9 months using Panasonic GX7, Leica X-Vario and Fuji X-E2 cameras. to see more on the cameras and lenses featured in this postĬlick on the relevant labels (tags and keywords) at the bottom of It will cost you nothing and you don't have toīuy anything to contribute a (very!) small amount to my coffers. To write about then clicking on a few adds will earn me a fewįractions of a penny. What you read and would like to help me to continue to keep buying stuff Small income from them, which covers expenses and some small recompenseįor the time I take to write this, but no more than that. Over the content, which differs from country to country. That appear on this site are generated by Google and I have no control I buy all the gear I use and write about. Review and I have no relationship with any manufacturer or retail The Soundimageplus blog is 100% independent. Remove any post (and poster) if I think fit. Review site and not intended to be so and the Google+ groups where youĬan post comments are not forums. I would also point out that this is not a This is a personal blog written 'in the moment' and is primarily What is written here is at no time intendedĪs a recommendation or otherwise of photographic gear or practice. Please note that opinions expressed in this blog are just that, opinions. However there are several things that I think show 'room for improvement.'Īll original material on this blog is © Soundimageplus.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER VS LIGHTROOM FUJI ISO
The sensor allows for low noise high ISO results.There are several things I think that are 'right' about the Fuji X system. Too often, however, there is a somewhat strange 'My camera right or wrong' attitude on the part of some purchasers. As far as I'm concerned it doesn't require huge levels of sophistication and maturity to be able to see the virtues AND the faults in the gear we use and still enjoy using it and what it offers us. Re-reading this, there is much I agree with and it's important to get a sense of perspective about what a camera / sensor / lens can do. Both of us got some pretty nasty abuse as a result of that, which when you think about it is peculiar, since both of us were only attempting to get better results from the cameras. I have a lot of time for Thom on Fuji, since when I was writing post after post about the raw processing problems with Fuji files and Adobe, he was making the same points. However I read it again and realised what a good, sensible, unblinkered assessment of both the X-T1 and the X-Trans sensor it was. When I clicked it I realised that I'd already seen it. In a recent exchange of comments on Google+ I was given this link.
0 kommentar(er)
